Astronomers On Life In The Cosmos
When it comes to the subject Astronomers of extraterrestrial life, exbiology or Astrobiology. It is the profession most associated with the astronomer *. That should be silly, as the focus should be on the word “life” or “biology”, not on the word “alien”, “Exo” or “Astro”. I have often said that when it comes to UFOs, for example. Astronomers are out of their league because the topic of UFOs is not an appropriate astronomical topic that astronomers. Can study professionally and therefore comment on on a professional level. Astronomers who are human and all that that entails do not always draw. A line in the sand between what they believe professionally through. Academic study and research and what they personally believe without the benefit of academic study and research.info technology hub
Astronomer who ended up
The only astronomer who ended up doing a serious professional study of UFOs, actually hired as a USAF consultant on UFOs, astronomically first, therefore all facets, was the late J. Allen Hynek, so he is qualified to become lyrical. What’s interesting is that he start out skeptical about the bona fide of the field. But came to the conclusion that UFOs were a serious scientific matter.
The astronomers square starts at the top of Earth’s atmosphere and goes from the outside to there. Although I would say things like meteorites are the realm of mineralogists. Lunar transient phenomena (TLP) and ‘Face’ on Mars and other dynamic features visible on planetary ‘surfaces’ and satellites are more straightforward for meteorologists, geologists, and perhaps even oceanographers (ie Jupiter’s moon, Europa).
WHAT ASTRONOMERS CAN, SHOULD NOT, CANNOT AND SHOULD NOT COMMENT ABOUT EXTRATERRESTRIAL LIFE
Probability of extraterrestrial life
The probability of extraterrestrial life: Astronomers can tell us approximately how many stars there are per year. Galaxy, and what kind of stars are they, and how many galaxies are there in the visible universe and roughly what the average solar system can look like. These are components and constituents, but this is how it works. When it emanates to whether life get up and progresses on any of these extra solar planets complete and including intelligence and technologies. An exercise best left to biologists and anthropologists.
Extrasolar Planets and Planetary Systems: Astronomers do an excellent job of discovering planets that orbit stars other than our sun. They can greatly estimate, perhaps guess guesswork, its orbital size and properties. They can also determine what the atmospheric components are, if any. But what exactly this composition mean – component perhap in a chemical imbalance that suggests biomarker – is an analysis best left to chemists and biochemist.
Origins of Life and Panspermia
Origins of Life and Panspermia: Astronomers do not have the academic good faith that allows them to get lyrical on these topics. Perhaps earthly life arose on Earth; maybe it came through spores (or something like that) from outer space (panspermia). But it’s not a topic that’s part of astronomy. Even if it’s extrapolate to homes somewhere out there.
Transition from simple (unicellular) to complex (multicellular) life. Any pontification on this subject by astronomers is outright in their personal opinion. Astronomers would be furious if evolutionary biologists got press coverage to comment on astrophysics in black holes. Yet astronomers seem to be able to practice biology as long as it is call alien biology, astrobiology, or outer space biology.
The evolutionary rise of intelligence, technology, and the life of civilization: These speculation are best left to anthropologists, as these topic go far beyond academic astronomy.
Life not as we know it: any speculation about alternative biochemistry (replacement of silicon with carbon, ammonia with water, etc.), in fact, it is better to leave the whole definition of what life is in the hands of biochemists and related disciplines .